According to the Transfer Portal For Playing Time, the
NCAA men’s basketball transfer portal has set a new record for the
most D-I and D-II entries in the first four days, with more than
1,015 players putting their name in thus far. For comparison, it
took six days longer to surpass 1,000 entries in 2022.
The transfer portal has created a period of unprecedented player
movement across the NCAA.
On "The Collision: Where Sports And Politics Collide,” me and my
co-host Dave Zirin did a deep dive into the transfer portal and
what this means for college basketball going forward.
Dave Zirin: I heard your former coach, Jim
Boeheim, discuss some of the things that have changed the dynamics
of college basketball. He discussed NIL and the transfer portal.
Has it surprised you how quickly the power dynamics have shifted in
college hoops?
Etan Thomas: Interesting. I was actually just
listening to Coach Boeheim discuss this on the radio with Jay
Williams and Keyshawn Johnson this morning after I dropped my kids
off at school. For me, as far as the transfer portal (goes), I’m
kind of torn on this topic, to be honest.
Dave: I am as well. I'm very torn, but please
continue.
Etan: So, on one hand, players now have
flexibility and I think it’s important for players to have that
flexibility to move to a different situation if the situation they
are currently in is not the best for them. So, I’m definitely all
for that. In addition, from a players perspective, you’re no
longer… how can I say this... held captive. I don’t want to use
that strong of a phrase and, of course, this is in a basketball
sense — don’t take this literal, please.
Dave: I understand what you’re saying.
Etan: Yeah, so I just want to make that point
clear. But in the past, no matter how bad the situation was for
you, from a player’s perspective, you were almost forced to deal
with it because [the] repercussion or punishment for transferring
would be that you had to sit out an entire year and lose that year
of eligibility. And that is a lot; you had to really be unhappy in
your situation to give up an entire year. Now, it’s different.
Players now have the flexibility to leave if the situation is not
good for them and I’m all for that, in theory.
Now, from a coaching standpoint — and this was Coach Boeheim’s
point this morning — how do you build a team with that reality,
[when] you have half of your team leaving every year? And I
understand that issue. But should players have the flexibility to
leave? I think so. I mean, coaches have the flexibility to leave
anytime they get a better opportunity somewhere. I always thought —
and this was way before the transfer portal was even a reality —
but I thought that if your coach left, you should have the right to
leave without having to sit out a year. I think that should’ve been
a rule anyway.
Dave: I definitely agree with that. I mean, that
definitely seems fair for so many reasons.
Etan: Right. But at the same time, when you look
at the transfer portal now, it just opened up and in, what, 3 days
you have over 1,000 players who want to transfer? That’s a
lot, so that’s why I’m torn on this topic.
Dave: Whew. I too am very torn on this.
So, on the one hand, the checkmate argument in favor of the
transfer portal is exactly what you just said: coaches can leave,
so why can’t players? Coaches don’t have to sit out a year, so why
should players? Coaches can pursue the best opportunities for
themselves and for their families, so why can’t the players make
similar choices in that regard? That, to me, is the most checkmate
of all checkmate arguments. But, there is another side to it, and
you can’t deny this other side. You know, you actually end up
sometimes losing arguments when you don’t grant that the other side
has a point.
Etan: That’s very true because then you look
unreasonable. It’s okay to say, "I agree with you here, but this is
where I have a different perspective."
Dave: Right, so the thing that I really don’t like
about the transfer portal is: I think there is actual value in team
sports of fighting your way forward, of being the person freshman
year who had to bust their hump to start sophomore year. And if
you’re that unhappy that you want to leave, I don’t mind there
being a high bar for that level of unhappiness. Listen, we all know
how this situation works, and we all know that young people can be
a tad impulsive. So, I like the idea of there being guard rails for
when players make these decisions to consider, "Okay, do you really
want to leave? Is it really that bad? Or are you just having a
really bad week or month? Is this something you can persevere
through?"
Now, with that being said, and I have to point him out because
he has been the most honest about it: Deion Sanders walks in at the
University of Colorado, addresses his players in full view of the
cameras and says something to the effect of, “Yeah, a third of you
won’t be here next year." And it’s like, you’re talking to
scholarship athletes in their teens and are basically telling them,
"Hey, that class you’re taking that you really like or your
girlfriend that you’re thinking of possibly proposing to in a few
years or that frat you just rushed, well good luck because those
life plans are out the window! Because I’m the new coach and I’m in
charge." And that doesn’t seem very fair because if you’re offered
a scholarship, that should mean something."
Etan: Yeah, but people still have to understand
that it is a year-to-year agreement. My wife gets tired of me using
her as an example, but it’s what happened to her after she tore her
ACL for the third time while she was playing at Syracuse. The
doctors told my wife (who was my girlfriend at the time), Nichole
Oliver, if she wanted to be able to run around and play with her
children when she was in her 30s, she would have to stop playing,
and the coaches tried to take her scholarship away.
Her and her mother actually had to get a lawyer and meet with
the Athletic Director and threaten legal action and a ton of bad
publicity for the university if they did that. And here’s the
thing, Dave: every time I tell this story, we get multiple messages
from parents or players asking for advice because their university
is trying to do that very same thing to them.
Dave: Wow, that’s awful.
Etan: Right, it's terrible. So, people do have to
put stories like that into consideration. But it’s an example of
how all of the power was always leaning to the side of the
colleges, and I never liked that dynamic. But again, like we said
earlier: there a thousand players in the transfer portal
right now!
So, what I would say is I think they should come up with a rule
that you get one transfer, so make it a good one because you only
get one. You have some players you see now and this is their third
transfer and their third different college, and their just a
junior! I’m not sure if that’s good either. So, that’s why I’m torn
on this topic.
Dave: I really like that idea. Thinking of my own
child, if my son went to a university and the coach was super
intense about recruiting him and then day one on campus, the coach
leaves, [that changes things]. Here is my son as a freshman and he
has to deal with the fact that he has to either [transfer] or find
peace with the new coach who may or may not even value him as a
player. He may not be a player he wants to play and he has no
connection to him because he never recruited him, so why would he
stay there?
Etan: I agree, 100%. So in my scenario, if you
only get one transfer, that’s like the exception. If your coach
leaves, that doesn’t count against your one transfer because, yes,
that changes everything for an athlete.
Dave: Ah, I like that too because the new coach
could have a completely different idea of what they want to do from
what you were promised when they recruited you there.
Etan: I agree. But with that being said, I do have
to be able to acknowledge — and this is what Coach Boeheim brought
up today on the radio — if he was still coaching now, he would be
chasing players to see who is going to stay and who is going to
leave, and it’s a musical chairs type of thing now. You lose four
players, you replace them with four new players. But how can a
coach actually coach players? If they don’t like anything, they
just leave! Well, I can see that both ways. If you’re being
brutally unfair to someone, yes, they’re probably going to leave
because you can no longer hold them captive. Some coaches call it
“coaching a player hard," but I don’t like that term because Bobby
Knight in his mind thought that’s what he was doing when it was
actually abuse. So, a coach can no longer do that and hold a player
captive anymore, and that’s a good thing, in my opinion.
But now the other side, and this is the part that Coach Boeheim
brought up, sometimes it’s simply not your turn yet. So I look at
myself: my freshman year at Syracuse, it just wasn’t my turn yet. I
was playing behind a more experienced, bigger, stronger and, quite
frankly, better senior center in Otis Hill, who had just
been to the NCAA Finals the year before, so I had to be patient.
And, of course, it was hard because I was at the bottom of the
totem pole on the team. But when I came back my sophomore year, I
was ready and prepared to step in as a starter, got back-to-back
Big East Defensive Player of the Year and things turned around for
me. But I had to wait, so I know firsthand that a bad situation can
definitely change.
Dave: If they had the transfer portal your
freshman year, would you have stayed?
Etan: Listen, I was almost going to transfer even
without them having the transfer portal how it is now (laughing).
But looking back now, I’m glad I didn’t make that decision. But I
was very close to doing it because it was not a good environment
and situation for me in my freshman year.
Coach Boeheim also used the example of Hakim Warrick, who didn’t play a
whole lot in his freshman year but then came back his sophomore
year and blocked the shot against Kansas in the championship game
that really won the game for Syracuse. So his point is that things
can change, and he’s right. So, there is an argument to be made
that some players are losing the lessons of perseverance, fighting
through adversity, etc. because at any hint of difficulty, they
transfer. But at the same time, there’s the question of should they
be able to have the flexibility and the choice to leave a situation
they are unhappy in? So, that’s why this is a complex topic.
Dave: Very complex indeed.