The NBA Draft is approaching,
and with the occasion comes the hypercritical eye of the casual
draft follower (i.e. myself). We critique picks unprovoked, provide
suggestions for NBA front offices from our chaise lounge and weigh
in on one of the biggest draft debates: Should teams select the
best player available, or pick the best fit?
This question has entered NBA
discourse even more so than usual — likely due to the apparent
saturation of talent among the
lottery’s projected top-five picks. It’s thought that teams approach the annual
draft with a certain philosophy that’s shaped by the demands of the
upcoming season in mind; to draft for fit, or to draft for talent.
But it begs the question: Are these draft approaches a matter of
preference for front offices, or are they just a product of
circumstance?
When drafting for “fit,” the
phrasing alone implies that overall talent is an afterthought, and
the main goal is to select a rookie who can be immediately
activated without changing the roster’s current structure. The fit
can range in specificity, so a rookie can be drafted to satisfy a
specific skill set a team lacks (such as spacing, defense or bench
scoring), or they can be selected to fit alongside the team’s
existing talent.
Conversely, drafting based on
“talent” alone implies a willingness for the team to accommodate to
the player. Either a franchise is establishing a pillar of their
core with its pick, or the team intends to make the expected
adjustments to seamlessly welcome this player into the fold.
BasketballNews.com’s resident draft
analyst, Matt Babcock, laid out the team
situation that calls for such an approach.
“If a team is rebuilding, they
may be more inclined to prioritize players who have significant
room for growth and upside more so than a team that is in win-now
mode that would more likely look for a player who is ready to
contribute right away, but does not possess as much untapped
potential,” Babcock said.
That brings up a
hardly-mentioned point: When discussing these schools of thought
long enough, it becomes clear that the meaning of “fit” and
“talent” is malleable -- heavily dependent on the state of an
organization.
How far along is this team in
their roster construction? Hard rebuild? Soft rebuild? A recent
championship unit that lucked into a lottery pick due to unforeseen
circumstances? Does upside even matter when there’s already an NBA
Finals appearance in the cards?
As we’ve seen time and time
again, gunning for talent when the fit is questionable can
compromise a player’s ability, stifle their growth on the court,
and even lead to a regression in skill with the sustained blows to
their confidence.
“Even talented players need to
be put into situations where they have the opportunity to develop
and succeed,” Babcock said. “It won't just happen naturally because
a player is talented. Fit always matters.”
What “fit” entails differs from
ball club to ball club. And more often than not, drafting the “best
player available” means different things depending on a team’s
needs.
When illustrating the
differences between these outlooks, draft fanatics on both sides
tend to talk in extremes. Babcock brings up the “we are going to
take a point guard, no matter what” parody that lends to the
fit-first stereotypes. As Babcock pointed
out, “Someone
who would take such a simplistic approach should probably not be
running an NBA team.”
With that said, there are a
multitude of lesser-known factors that impact how patient or risky
a front office is in their drafting process.
“Every year, there always seem
to be a few players who slip in the draft further than expected,
which usually is a result of teams gathering negative intel about
the players or learning about medical information that raises
red-flags,” Babcock explained. “In regards to negative intel, it usually boils
down to a few things: How highly does a team value a player’s
basketball talent? Also, how much job security does the general
manager have? Can they afford to take a high-risk, high-reward
prospect?”
Considering the rush to be the
first keen eye to spot the next big steal, it's worth highlighting
the floating variables outside of the draft itself that go on to
impact the order.
The best players remaining on
the board are not exempt from the time and investment required to
nurture their potential. The luxury of going out on a limb on a
“high-risk, high-reward” project requires a level of trust and
accountability that isn’t enjoyed by every front office around the
NBA.
There are several gears in
motion that hold power over how teams wield their picks — more
power than the “fit” vs. “talent” binary allows
for.
In spite of the complicated and
unglamorous components to this annual dance, one thing is for sure:
Talent determines fit, and fit doesn’t exclude talent.