All is well in Warrior Land.
Klay Thompson’s back from his 941-day hiatus, and he’s rekindled
his usual splashiness with an added wrinkle of dribble creation. Draymond Green
has resurrected his podcast career and should be back on the floor
shortly. Andrew Wiggins may not be an All-Star starter in impact,
but he's still playing like a top-50 player. Youngsters
Jonathan Kuminga, Moses Moody, and James Wiseman (via Twitter
workout videos) show just enough flashes to keep Warriors to
Twitter at Bay (ha, get it).
I repeat: All is well in Warrior Land, set up to compete now and
well into the future.
So what then, is this all about?
To figure it out, I caught up with Connor Letourneau of the San
Francisco Chronicle — the man credited with breaking this story:
“My understanding is that the Warriors will try to sign Poole to
a contract extension this summer, which would keep him from hitting
restricted free agency in summer 2023," Letourneau told
BasketballNews.com. "To get a deal done, Golden State will probably
have to ink him to a contract in the four-year, $80 million
range."
On the surface, that seems like a gross overpay, particularly
when you factor in Golden State's current salary-cap situation.
Letourneau followed up on that.
“The Warriors think he's worth it. And I don't blame them,"
Letourneau said. "Poole has improved more in the past two years
than perhaps anyone else in the NBA, and he's only 22. I could see
him becoming a CJ McCollum type. But then again, I should know
better than to put a ceiling on him. He has far exceeded every
projection I've had for him to this point.”
Great point. And I like the McCollum comparison, but I’d take it
a step further. When I see the wirey, chaotic guard blazing across
the court and soaring into the air, I get flashes of Zach Lavine —
a player who cashed in a similar deal not too long ago.
In the summer of 2018, Lavine inked a four-year, $76 million
dollar deal with Chicago (as a restricted free agent). Here is how
he compared to Poole at the time:
Lavine 2017-18 v. Poole 2021-22 (mobile
users scroll right for full table)
Player
|
Age
|
% of Cap*
|
PTS per 75**
|
Relative TS%**
|
FTA per 75**
|
AST%**
|
Lavine
|
22
|
≈ 19.1%
|
22.4
|
-5.7
|
6.0
|
18.6%
|
Poole
|
22
|
≈ 16.5%
|
20.7
|
+2.1
|
4.0
|
18.7%
|
* Data provided by Spotrac
** Data provided by Basketball-Reference
Of course, Lavine has since progressed to All-Star status and
earned himself a reputation as one of the 20 best offensive players in basketball. He’s worth
every penny the Bulls paid him way back when.
If I was a betting man, I’d put a reasonable amount of Prize
Picks money on Poole doing the same.
Now, this is the part where someone pulls this up:
True, but Poole isn’t like other young players.
For starters, at age-22, he’s already adept at scoring at all
three levels of the basketball court. Stepback three-pointers,
balletic mid-range floaters, herky-jerky dribble moves into gallant
attacks at the rim. All those things are firmly in his wheelhouse.
How do I know that? He literally flashed it all in less than
*checks clock* five minutes of game time.
Outside of the All-Star trio (Ja Morant, Zion Williamson and
Darius Garland), the player who gets the most air time from the
2019 NBA Draft class is Tyler Herro, which is fair. He’s made some
massive strides this year. But
why aren’t people making outlandish claims about Poole like
this?
Poole's shooting splits are just as promising:
Player
|
Rim %*
|
Midrange %*
|
Three Point %*
|
Herro
|
59%
|
41%
|
38%
|
Poole
|
66%
|
46%
|
34%
|
* Data provided by Cleaning the Glass
Poole is converting shots at the rim and from the mid-range at a
significantly higher rate than Herro. And while his three-pointer
may be lagging behind, his league-leading free throw percentage
(92.2%) is a strong indicator that he’ll figure it out from beyond
the arc.
Also, for my volume stans out there, Poole has maintained his
True Shooting percentage from last year (58.1%), despite taking
nearly four more shots per game.
As it stands, his passing is how you say ~ volatile ~ seesawing between
sublime and errant depending on the possession (hence his
career-highs in assist and turnover rate). When it’s working,
though, things get freaky:
One thing that should stand out
to you about that clip (gifted to us by the venerable
Charlie Cummings) is Poole’s ability to draw two to the ball.
That occurrence should trigger memories of this:
I’m not the first person to make that connection — Jackson Frank and Joe Viray have written about
this — but Poole’s gravity (second-best on the team) enables him to
temporarily masquerade as the resident, baby-faced assassin within
the Warriors' offensive system. This ability to temporarily operate
as the team’s lead guard and short-roll ignitor takes a massive
burden off the chiseled shoulders of Curry, who has had a history
of gradually breaking down during the second half of the season
(see the 2016 playoffs).
Also, it’s worth noting that very few players can be the
understudy of one of 10 best offensive players ever.
One last note I want to make about Poole is regarding his
character, which is normally something I try to avoid (it’s mainly
speculation unless you know the person). But when so many people
sing your praises, that has to mean something. Listen to this great
clip of two of the best basketball minds ever talking about his
maturation as a decision-maker:
That’s how everyone from the championship crew talks about him.
Curry, Green, Thompson, Andre Iguodala — they all love Poole's
guts. Game recognizes game. They see the fierceness, the swagger,
the hunger and the relentless quest for knowledge and skill.
When you combine that package of intangibles with the product
you see on the court, $20 million dollars annually looks like a
bargain.